Phenotypic Mutation 'Lostnf2' (pdf version)
AlleleLostnf2
Mutation Type missense
Chromosome11
Coordinate116,491,017 bp (GRCm39)
Base Change A ⇒ T (forward strand)
Gene Rhbdf2
Gene Name rhomboid 5 homolog 2
Synonym(s) cub, iRhom2, 4732465I17Rik, Rhbdl6, Uncv
Chromosomal Location 116,488,991-116,517,786 bp (-) (GRCm39)
MGI Phenotype PHENOTYPE: Mice homozygous for a null mutation display impaired TNF secretion and increased sensitivity to bacterial infection induced mortality. [provided by MGI curators]
Accession Number

NCBI RefSeq: NM_172572, NM_001167680; MGI:2442473

MappedYes 
Amino Acid Change Valine changed to Glutamic Acid
Institutional SourceBeutler Lab
Gene Model predicted gene model for protein(s): [ENSMUSP00000099317] [ENSMUSP00000099318]
AlphaFold Q80WQ6
SMART Domains Protein: ENSMUSP00000099317
Gene: ENSMUSG00000020806
AA Change: V645E

DomainStartEndE-ValueType
Pfam:Rhomboid_SP 98 306 1.8e-98 PFAM
transmembrane domain 376 398 N/A INTRINSIC
Pfam:Rhomboid 619 763 4.6e-31 PFAM
transmembrane domain 775 797 N/A INTRINSIC
Predicted Effect possibly damaging

PolyPhen 2 Score 0.936 (Sensitivity: 0.80; Specificity: 0.94)
(Using ENSMUST00000103028)
SMART Domains Protein: ENSMUSP00000099318
Gene: ENSMUSG00000020806
AA Change: V645E

DomainStartEndE-ValueType
Pfam:Rhomboid_SP 98 304 4.7e-97 PFAM
transmembrane domain 376 398 N/A INTRINSIC
Pfam:Rhomboid 619 763 8.1e-31 PFAM
transmembrane domain 775 797 N/A INTRINSIC
Predicted Effect possibly damaging

PolyPhen 2 Score 0.936 (Sensitivity: 0.80; Specificity: 0.94)
(Using ENSMUST00000103029)
Meta Mutation Damage Score 0.9297 question?
Is this an essential gene? Non Essential (E-score: 0.000) question?
Phenotypic Category Autosomal Semidominant
Candidate Explorer Status loading ...
Single pedigree
Linkage Analysis Data
Penetrance  
Alleles Listed at MGI

All mutations/alleles(39) : Chemically induced (ENU)(2) Gene trapped(32) Targeted(5)

Lab Alleles
AlleleSourceChrCoordTypePredicted EffectPPH Score
IGL01069:Rhbdf2 APN 11 116492577 missense possibly damaging 0.80
IGL01464:Rhbdf2 APN 11 116491734 missense probably benign 0.18
IGL02060:Rhbdf2 APN 11 116491452 missense probably damaging 1.00
IGL02211:Rhbdf2 APN 11 116491261 missense possibly damaging 0.49
Lostnf UTSW 11 116490987 missense probably damaging 1.00
sinecure UTSW 11 116493086 missense probably damaging 0.99
Trapezoid UTSW 11 116491974 missense probably damaging 0.96
R0131:Rhbdf2 UTSW 11 116496170 missense probably damaging 1.00
R0399:Rhbdf2 UTSW 11 116494818 missense probably benign 0.00
R0739:Rhbdf2 UTSW 11 116490987 missense probably damaging 1.00
R1756:Rhbdf2 UTSW 11 116498092 missense probably benign
R1839:Rhbdf2 UTSW 11 116491017 missense possibly damaging 0.94
R2029:Rhbdf2 UTSW 11 116491974 missense probably damaging 0.96
R3833:Rhbdf2 UTSW 11 116495250 missense probably damaging 1.00
R4330:Rhbdf2 UTSW 11 116492782 missense probably benign
R4331:Rhbdf2 UTSW 11 116493122 missense probably damaging 1.00
R4872:Rhbdf2 UTSW 11 116492771 missense probably benign 0.04
R5530:Rhbdf2 UTSW 11 116491488 missense probably damaging 1.00
R5625:Rhbdf2 UTSW 11 116496203 missense probably damaging 0.99
R5841:Rhbdf2 UTSW 11 116493180 unclassified probably benign
R6579:Rhbdf2 UTSW 11 116495289 missense probably benign 0.02
R7047:Rhbdf2 UTSW 11 116494477 critical splice donor site probably null
R7403:Rhbdf2 UTSW 11 116491245 missense probably damaging 1.00
R7743:Rhbdf2 UTSW 11 116494775 missense probably benign
R7743:Rhbdf2 UTSW 11 116492427 missense probably benign 0.04
R7855:Rhbdf2 UTSW 11 116493066 nonsense probably null
R8055:Rhbdf2 UTSW 11 116498191 missense probably benign 0.01
R8700:Rhbdf2 UTSW 11 116498230 start gained probably benign
R9052:Rhbdf2 UTSW 11 116494758 missense probably benign 0.00
X0027:Rhbdf2 UTSW 11 116489919 missense probably benign
Mode of Inheritance Autosomal Semidominant
Local Stock
MMRRC Submission 038177-MU
Last Updated 2019-09-04 9:46 PM by Katherine Timer
Record Created 2015-03-15 11:48 PM by Zhao Zhang
Record Posted 2015-03-25
Phenotypic Description

Figure 1. Lostnf2 mice exhibited decreased TNFα secretion in response to the TLR4 ligand, LPS. TNFα levels were determined by ELISA. Normalized data are shown. Abbreviations: WT, wild-type; REF, homozygous reference mice; HET, heterozygous variant mice; VAR, homozygous variant mice. Mean (μ) and standard deviation (σ) are indicated.

Figure 2. Lostnf2 mice exhibited decreased TNFα secretion in response to the TLR1/2 ligand, Pam3CSK4. TNFα levels were determined by ELISA. Normalized data are shown. Abbreviations: WT, wild-type; REF, homozygous reference mice; HET, heterozygous variant mice; VAR, homozygous variant mice. Mean (μ) and standard deviation (σ) are indicated.

Figure 3. Lostnf2 mice exhibited decreased TNFα secretion in response to the TLR7/8 ligand, R848. TNFα levels were determined by ELISA. Normalized data are shown. Abbreviations: WT, wild-type; REF, homozygous reference mice; HET, heterozygous variant mice; VAR, homozygous variant mice. Mean (μ) and standard deviation (σ) are indicated.

The Lostnf2 phenotype was identified among ENU-mutagenized G3 mice of the pedigree R1839, some of which exhibited decreased TNFα (see the record for PanR1) secretion in response to the Toll-like receptor (TLR) ligands LPS (TLR4; Figure 1), Pam3CSK4 (TLR1/2; Figure 2) and R848 (TLR7/8; Figure 3).

Nature of Mutation

Figure 4. Linkage mapping of the reduced TNFα secretion after LPS stimulation using an additive model of inheritance. Manhattan plot shows -log10 P values (Y-axis) plotted against the chromosome positions of 94 mutations (X-axis) identified in the G1 male of pedigree R0304.  Raw phenotype data are shown for single locus linkage analysis without consideration of G2 dam identity.  Horizontal pink and red lines represent thresholds of P = 0.05, and the threshold for P = 0.05 after applying Bonferroni correction, respectively.

Whole exome HiSeq sequencing of the G1 grandsire identified 94 mutations. All of the above anomalies were linked by continuous variable mapping to a mutation in Rhbdf2: a T to A transversion at base pair 116,600,191 (v38) on chromosome 11, or base pair 26,829 in the GenBank genomic region NC_000077. The strongest association was found with an additive model of linkage to the normalized TLR4 response, wherein 29 variant heterozygotes and 2 variant homozygotes departed phenotypically from 18 homozygous reference mice with a P value of 1.038 x 10-11 (Figure 4). The mutation corresponds to residue 2,455 in the mRNA sequence NM_172572 within exon 18 of 19 total exons.

2439 CACTGCCTTGTGTCTGTGGTCTTCCAAATGACC

639  -H--C--L--V--S--V--V--F--Q--M--T-

The mutated nucleotide is indicated in red.  The mutation results in a valine (V) to glutamic acid (E) substitution at position 645 (V645E) in the RHBDF2 protein.

Illustration of Mutations in
Gene & Protein
Protein Prediction

Figure 5. Domains of RHBDF2. (A) RHBDF2 has predicted TMDs occurring at amino acids 382-402, 628-648, 664-684, 687-707, 719-739, 745-765, and 774-794; the 381 N-terminal amino acids are predicted to be cytoplasmic. RHBDF2 has predicted phosphorylation sites at serines 60, 83, 87, 293, 295, and 298 as well as an N-glycosylation site at amino acid 555. The Lostnf2 mutation causes a valine to glutamic acid substitution at amino acid 645. Image is interactive; click to view other Rhbdf2 mutations. (B) The iRhoms have a 6 + 1 TMD membrane topology. The N-terminus is cytoplasmic; the C-terminus is intracellular. The Lostnf2  mutation (V645E) is indicated by a red asterisk. Image is interactive; click to view other Rhbdf2 mutations.

Rhbdf2 or iRhom2 encodes an 827 amino acid rhomboid-like protein (Figure 5A). RHBDF2 is considered to be an iRhom, a conserved group of proteolytically inactive rhomboid-like proteins with proline residues in their active site and characteristic luminal loop domains (1). The iRhoms have a 6 + 1 transmembrane domain (TMD) membrane topology (1); the Lostnf2 mutation (V645E) occurs within TMD 2 (alternatively, TMD 1 within the 6 TMD cluster) (Figure 5B).

For more information on RHBDF2, see the record for sinecure.

Putative Mechanism

Rhomboid proteases are involved in many different biological processes in diverse organisms [reviewed in (2)]. The role of RHBDF2 in innate immunity has been studied using Rhbdf2 knockout (Rhbdf2-/-) mouse models (3;4). Ablation of Rhbdf2 had no effect on the induction of IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-12 by peritoneal macrophages upon LPS stimulation (3). However, TNF-α secretion by LPS-stimulated macrophages was reduced; TNF-α mRNA and protein levels were upregulated normally and TNF-α was expressed appropriately at the plasma membrane of Rhbdf2-/- macrophages. Adrain et al. proposed there was a defect in the shedding of the ectodomain of TNF-α, a process necessary for TNF-α activation (3). Further examination of the Rhbdf2-/-macrophages found that TNF-α converting enzyme (TACE; see the record for wavedX) was absent from the cell surface due to an inability of the protein to traffic from the ER to the trans-Golgi network. TACE activity is essential for the cleavage of TNF-α to yield the bioactive form in response to numerous stimuli including PMA and LPS (5-7). Taken together, RHBDF2 is either involved in the folding and/or maturation of TACE in the ER, or it is a cargo receptor that assists in the trafficking of TACE (3;4). Loss of RHBDF2 function, as in the Lostnf2 and sinecure mice (8), would lead to an inability of TACE to exit the secretory pathway and a subsequent failure in cleavage and release of TNF from the cell surface. 

Primers PCR Primer
Lostnf2_pcr_F: CCAAAAGGAAGGGCTCATCC
Lostnf2_pcr_R: TTCCTGCATGCTGGGTAAG

Sequencing Primer
Lostnf2_seq_F: GGCTCATCCCACCCTCTCTG
Lostnf2_seq_R: TAAGAGGCACCCTGTTGCC
Genotyping

PCR program

1) 94°C 2:00
2) 94°C 0:30
3) 55°C 0:30
4) 72°C 1:00
5) repeat steps (2-4) 40x
6) 72°C 10:00
7) 4°C hold


The following sequence of 404 nucleotides is amplified (chromosome 11, - strand):


1   ttcctgcatg ctgggtaaga ggcaccctgt tgccccatgc tcagactccc atgtctcccc
61  tcttgggtgc cggagaaaag ggcttccaga ccgagcacac tggctcaacc tgctagtgct
121 agactgcgct gtggtgtgct ctgcgggtga ccatgggcac acaggaaagg ctgatggtgc
181 tcatgtgcct accccagcat agtgcactgc cttgtgtctg tggtcttcca aatgaccatc
241 ctgagggacc tagagaagct ggccggctgg caccgcatct ccatcatctt catccttagt
301 ggcattacag gcaacctggc cagcgccatc ttcctcccct accgggcaga ggtacaaact
361 tgggagacaa gggcagagag ggtgggatga gcccttcctt ttgg


Primer binding sites are underlined and the sequencing primers are highlighted; the mutated nucleotide is shown in red.

References

  1. Lemberg, M. K., and Freeman, M. (2007) Cutting Proteins within Lipid Bilayers: Rhomboid Structure and Mechanism. Mol Cell. 28, 930-940.

Science Writers Anne Murray
Illustrators Katherine Timer
AuthorsZhao Zhang, Ying Wang, Hexin Shi, Doan Dao, Lei Sun, Bruce Beutler